Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 23

The top five premium volume states, Nebraska,
Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, and North Dakota,
had loss ratios of 1.24, 0.59, 1.09, 0.54, and 1.05,
respectively. Overall, 22 of the 42 states had
loss ratios of 0.50 or less, shown in pink and
yellow on the map. Six additional states, shown
in green, had loss ratios between 0.50 and 0.75,
while no states had loss ranges falling between
0.75 and 1.00.
[Information sources for this section include:
NCIS' Insured Crop Summary and claim files.]

Figure 18 2017 Crop-Hail Premium and Loss Ratios
All Crop, Perils, Plans Combined

Canadian Crop-Hail
Experience
Crop-Hail business in Canada is primarily written in the prairie provinces of Alberta,
Manitoba and Saskatchewan. Denoting Canadian dollars with C$, Table 8 presents the
totals by year. Overall premiums for Canada
declined from C$302 million in 2016 to C$286
million in 2017, some of which might be attributed to the 9 percent reduction in the number of policies written for the year. Loss experience improved enormously, with losses paid
to farmers declining to C$97 million in 2017
from C$269 in 2016. The number of claims
dropped precipitously to 8,633 from 20,325
in the prior year, while the average claim size
declined to C$11,209 from C$13,325 in 2016.
Overall, the loss ratio for the three Canadian
provinces was 0.34, second only to the loss ratio of 0.29 in 2009, and a significant improvement over the loss ratio of 0.85 in 2016.
For the individual provinces, Manitoba saw
an increase in premium of 7 percent, to C$50
million, while Saskatchewan and Alberta saws
reductions of nine and 4 percent, respectively.
Policy counts were down in all three provinces, with reductions of 2 percent in Manitoba,
9 percent in Saskatchewan, and 15 percent in
Alberta.
Total payouts for the year in Manitoba were
C$23 million, roughly one-third of the C$74
million paid in 2016. The loss ratio fell to 0.46
from 1.59 percent a year ago. Losses for Saskatchewan decreased from C$129 million in
2016 to C$48 million in 2017, resulting in an
improvement in the loss ratio from 0.73 to 0.30.
Payouts also fell substantially in Alberta, from
C$65 million in 2016 to C$25 million this year,
with the loss ratio falling from 0.84 to 0.34.
[The information source for this section was
the Canadian Crop Hail Association.]

Data ss of April 23, 2018
Source: National Crop Insurance Services Insured Crop Summary and NCIS6b

CONCLUSION

In 2017 Federal crop insurance provided a much-needed risk management tool to
American farmers and ranchers in a year of
highlighted by localized catastrophic weather events that remind us what a risky business
farming and ranching is. Farmers paid more
than $3.7 billion to buy 1.125 million policies.
The companies assessed losses and paid claims
on more than 302,000 policies. The low level of
farm income continues and weighs heavily on
all of agriculture, and while cases of severe or
catastrophic loss were limited, for those areas

where disaster struck, Federal crop insurance
provided much needed assistance, helping with
their journey to recovery. The crop insurance
industry continues to provide an effective and
affordable risk management tool for U.S. agriculture, but it will face challenges in the coming year as policy makers craft a new farm bill.
Hopefully the partnership between the Federal
government and the private insurance companies will be able to remain the solid foundation
for financial stability that is needed for farmers
and ranchers across the diverse landscape that
is U.S. agriculture.

Table 8 Canadian Crop-Hail Results, All Perils
	

CROP YEAR	

PREMIUM	

LOSSES	

	

	

Mil. C$	

Mil. C$

	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	

2008	
2009	
20102	
20112	
2012	
2013	
2014	
2015	
2016	
2017	

NUMBER OF CLAIMS	

289	341	
262	76	
263	155	
269	164	
341	280	
344	172	
316	249	
274	167	
302	269	
286	97	

LOSS RATIO1

29,000	
4,075	
16,000	
15,000	
21,600	
13,321	
13,372	
13,222	
20,325	
8,633	

1.18
0.29
0.59
0.61
0.82
0.50
0.79
0.61
0.89
0.34

Loss ratios do not reflect loss adjustment costs.
Number of claims exceeded value indicated.
Data as of November 20, 2017
Source: The Canadian Hail Association
1
2

CROPINSURANCE TODAY®

23



Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Crop Insurance Today June 2018

No label
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - No label
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - Cover2
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 1
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 2
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 3
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 4
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 5
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 6
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 7
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 8
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 9
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 10
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 11
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 12
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 13
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 14
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 15
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 16
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 17
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 18
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 19
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 20
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 21
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 22
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 23
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 24
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 25
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 26
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 27
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 28
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 29
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 30
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 31
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 32
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 33
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 34
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 35
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 36
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 37
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 38
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 39
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - 40
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - Cover3
Crop Insurance Today June 2018 - Cover4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/56-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/56-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/55-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/55-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/55-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/55-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/54-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/54-3
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/54-2
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/54-1
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/53-4
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/53-03
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/53-02
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/53-01
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/52-04
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/52-03
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/52-02
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/52-01
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/51-04
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/51-03
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/51-02
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/51-01
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/50-04
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/50-3
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/50-2
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/50-1
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/49-4
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/49-3
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/may2016
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/february2016
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/november2015
http://www.brightcopy.net/allen/cint/september2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/may2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/february2015
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/november2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/september2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/may2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/february2014
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/november2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/august2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/may2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/february2013
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/november2012
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/august2012
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/may2012
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/february2012
https://www.nxtbook.com/allen/cint/44-4
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com